When Victims Become Killers: The Shocking Cases of Abuse Survivors Who Struck Back
When 48-year-old Missouri resident Claudine “Dee Dee” Blanchard was found brutally stabbed to death in June 2015, the most chilling detail wasn’t just the crime—it was the Facebook post that followed.
“The B—- is dead!” her 23-year-old daughter, Gypsy Rose Blanchard, wrote.
It was a celebration, not a confession. But soon, the truth unraveled. Gypsy had orchestrated the murder, persuading her boyfriend, Nicholas Godejohn, to carry out the gruesome attack.
Despite her role in the killing, Greene County Prosecutor Dan Patterson offered Gypsy Rose a plea deal: just 10 years in prison for second-degree murder—the minimum sentence. Why? Because for years, she had been subjected to unimaginable abuse by her own mother, forced to endure unnecessary medical procedures, including eye surgery, salivary gland removal, and even the insertion of a feeding tube.
But does the justice system always show such leniency when abuse victims kill their abusers? Not always. Let’s examine the cases that shook the legal system and left the world divided.
The Woman Who Set Her Husband on Fire—And Walked Free
For over a decade, Francine Hughes endured relentless physical and psychological torment at the hands of her alcoholic husband, James Hughes. The night of March 9, 1977, was the breaking point. After a brutal beating, James forced Francine to eat off the floor before raping her—right in front of their children.
Hours later, he passed out. That’s when Francine took matters into her own hands. She drenched his bedroom in gasoline, struck a match, and walked away. He never woke up.
Charged with murder, Francine pleaded not guilty by reason of temporary insanity. The jury agreed, and she was acquitted. Her story became a nationwide sensation, inspiring the book The Burning Bed and a television movie starring Farrah Fawcett.
But was her acquittal a precedent or an anomaly?
The Menendez Brothers: Victims or Cold-Blooded Killers?
Abuse victims who kill their tormentors don’t always find sympathy in the courtroom.
In 1989, Erik and Lyle Menendez brutally executed their parents, Jose and Kitty, inside their Beverly Hills mansion. They claimed years of sexual abuse at the hands of their father pushed them to commit the horrific act.
Initially, their defense resonated with some jurors. But when their retrial barred key abuse testimony, the brothers were convicted of first-degree murder. The jury was unconvinced that their actions were justified—especially since their parents had been watching television when the attack occurred. Both Erik and Lyle received life sentences without parole.
Legal experts argue that their case was classified as a “nonconfrontational killing”—meaning they weren’t in imminent danger at the time of the murders. Unlike Francine Hughes, their defense didn’t hold up in court.
Nicole Addimando: A New Era of Justice for Abuse Survivors?
In September 2017, Nicole Addimando shot her partner, Christopher Grover, in their Poughkeepsie, New York, home. Prosecutors claimed he was asleep at the time; Nicole argued she had acted in self-defense against years of brutal abuse.
Her initial sentence? 19 years to life.
But then, a breakthrough. Under New York’s Domestic Violence Survivors Justice Act, her sentence was dramatically reduced to just seven and a half years. This law, along with similar measures in California, recognized that victims of long-term abuse shouldn’t be judged the same way as cold-blooded killers.
When Does the Law Show Mercy?
Cindene Pezzell, director of the National Defense Center for Criminalized Survivors, believes that the legal system still struggles to properly address these cases.
“The culpability of somebody who was abused is really different from someone who kills out of pure malice,” Pezzell explains. “Context is everything.”
But as the Menendez case proved, context doesn’t always guarantee a fair trial.
A System Still in Conflict
The justice system continues to grapple with one haunting question: When abuse victims kill, should they be punished—or protected?
From a battered woman setting her husband ablaze to two brothers gunning down their parents, each case is a test of how far the law is willing to go in recognizing abuse as a mitigating factor.
Some walk free. Others die in prison. And as new cases emerge, the debate rages on.